HazBlog-002: Mass Wasting in Burundi, December 2019

The HazMapper project was first envisioned and designed for locating mass wasting events in vegetated environments. We quickly realized that the Google Earth Engine application that we built can be used as a multi-hazard platform, as exemplified by the tornado-track example in our first post. Here we discuss the capabilities of HazMapper for its initial intended purpose, the location and characterization of mass wasting events, including landslides, debris flows, and down-stream flooding resulting from heavy precipitation events.

We first learned of widespread rainfall-triggered mass wasting in Burundi from Dave Petley’s AGU Landslide Blog that he posted on 13 January 2020. In early December 2019, heavy rains fell over the northwestern Cibitoke Province of Burundi. These rains triggered landslides, many initiating high on hillslopes as shallow-rapid soil or weathered bedrock slides that transitioned into deadly debris flows once channelized. Further downstream along the main rivers, significant flooding occurred. An assessment report published on Reliefweb seven days after the December 4-5 event indicate that there were at least 45 casualties, destruction of 206 homes, and significant damage to local infrastructure. ABP posted some photos of the aftermath of the event in a pair of Twitter posts on 5 December (post 1 and post 2) .

Photo courtesy @ABPInfos

The steep hillslopes of the eastern African nation are heavily vegetated. We can get a good idea for where impacts were most severe by identifying loss in this vegetation across the December 4-5 storms. The region shown below is the most heavily concentrated region of hillslope movements. Reds and yellows represent the most severe vegetation loss.

Figure 1. Loss of vegetation across the December 4-5 storms south of Magongwe, Burundi. rdNDVI = relative difference normalized difference vegetation index

At HazMapper, we are focusing on identifying loss in vegetation as a proxy for hillslope movements because it is so easy to interpret! See the images below, where we compare color satellite images from before and after the event. Then check out the loss in vegetation metric (“rdNDVI”) shown on the right panel. By applying a color scale to the rdNDVI data from HazMapper that only represents vegetation loss, we can quickly identify the fresh mass wasting scars. Which image directs your eyes to the debris flows faster, the post-event color image (center), or the HazMapper-rdNDVI map (right)?

Figure 2. Pre-event vs. post-event comparisons do a fair job at identifying the land surface change, but what if we look strictly at the loss of surface vegetation instead? It’s a different way to evaluate for landslides, debris flows, or flooding hazards. As a teaser, we note that the creation of the pre- and post-event color images have some significant processing behind them too, but we’ll leave that for a different post!

Zooming in, we can see some interesting but expected detail regarding the Burundi event. Shallow soil-driven landslides likely initiated near ridge crests of steep slopes. These small landslides can mobilize into large and dangerous debris flows, which is exactly what happened here. You can see the debris flows coalesce, bringing more water, debris, and energy downslope. Once the flows move off of the steepest mountain terrain, they begin to slow down, deposit a lot of the “debris” they’ve been carrying like rocks, trees, and sediment, and start to transition to pure flooding hazards. We can see these phases in the rdNDVI data:

Figure 3. Using the vegetation loss metric, rdNDVI, to locate the different phases of the mass wasting event. Landslides initiate on the steepest slopes near ridges or where streams have over-steepened hillsides. These landslides mobilize to debris flows, and finally the debris flows transition to floods in the larger river channels.

Another advantage of the vegetation loss metric is that we can see exactly what occurred at locations of previous mass wasting. Back on the Figure 2 pre-event panel (left), you may have noticed a large existing landslide in the center of the scene. Across the December 4-5 event, we can see some cool colors inside this pre-existing feature, meaning what little vegetation had re-grown since the initial landslide likely failed. However, if the whole mass slid, we would expect a large loss of vegetation at the bottom of the slide (“toe”), which is not observed. This indicates that there was probably some reactivation of sliding on this feature, but not a full failure!

Figure 4. Using the rdNDVI metric to look at reactivation of an existing landslide. If this mobilized to a full failure, we would expect large vegetation loss at the toe (bottom) of the feature. We don’t see that, leading us to interpret that the Dec. 4-5 event caused minor reactivation of this pre-existing landslide feature.

This post has provided a very quick analysis of the 2019 Burundi mass wasting event. All of the data used in this analysis is completely open-access. Our goal with this project is to build open-access tools that can be used by anyone, anywhere, to rapidly assess natural hazard impacts or to use for researching historical events. We did not do any post-processing to the data export from HazMapper.

We’ll continue showing examples of what is capable with the HazMapper platform until we can finally release it! Peer-review underway, stay tuned and thanks for reading.

– Corey Scheip & Karl Wegmann | Geomorphology @ NC State University

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: